logo

The Next Generation
Systemic thinking:
youth ministry as wind chime

Duffy Robbins

It seems strange to think of wind chimes as a metaphor for youth ministry programming, but the parallels are intriguing. When wind chimes are hung carefully, and in proper balance, the notes blend together. But when the chimes are hung carelessly or out of balance, there will likely be a malfunction. There may be a sound, but it will be cacophonous-disharmony where there was intended to be harmony-or monotonous, with one note where there was intended to be many. Each chime must be sounded to strike the proper chord.

Like a wind chime, any youth ministry program will entail several different components: programs for outreach, programs for nurture, programs for leadership. Each of these elements of the program is essential. If any one of them is missing in a program, the result can be monotony (stagnation) or disharmony (lack of unity among the people or the programs involved). And they must be in proper balance: a program with all outreach and little nurture leads to a large, shallow ministry; a program of all nurture with little outreach can breed a small, ingrown ministry. And, most important, like a wind chime, where there is no wind, there is no melody. Even the most dynamic youth ministry program, in and of itself, offers nothing if there is not blowing through it the fresh wind of God's Spirit.

The balance and interdependency of these various elements of a youth ministry program is best described as a system of relationships. Thinking about youth ministry programs in this way is called systemic thinking.

What insights relevant for youth ministry programming can be gained from the discipline of systemic thinking? We'll look at a few over the next few issues of Good News. Let's begin with this one:

We need to see each facet of the youth ministry program as interconnected. Individual elements of a program may be complementary, competitive, synergistic, or even destructive. Thinking of the program as a system of interconnected elements prevents one facet of the program from working against another.

. The discipleship program may be so demanding, or so insular, that it isolates the committed students from the very students they need to reach for Christ.

. The overall youth ministry programming environment may be so packed and busy that it actually prevents active students from building a healthy relationship with their families.

. Systemic issues can play out in other ways as well. Many of those who read this column are familiar with the para-church ministry Young Life, a ministry designed to reach unchurched teenagers. It's a wonderful ministry, but their small group ministry, Campaigners, meets in some communities on Sunday night, precluding students from being involved in local church youth ministries. Young Life has always said its goal was to reach teenagers so that they could be plugged into a local church, but their own programming may make it impossible for some students.

Even within a single meeting or ministry event, wise programming seeks to consider how the individual elements combine to build a unified whole. For example, I've spoken at countless weekend retreats where the Saturday night schedule looked something like this:

7:30 - 9:00 Large Group Meeting: Session #3

9:15 - 9:45 Cabin Time/Small Groups

10:00 - 12:00 Dance

Now, I'm not anti-dance per se. But when I hang out in the room during these dances, I see much that encourages just the opposite ethos from what was created earlier in the evening session. One has to ask: are these elements of the program in harmony? Maybe yes, maybe no. But more often than not, my own observation of these dances is that they sound a completely different chord than the one that was struck by the earlier session.

I recall speaking at one weekend event during which the Saturday morning schedule offered a camp-wide forum on sex and dating. The intent of the session was to look at some of these issues from the standpoint of a Christian worldview. The session took place as scheduled, there was a time of question and answer, and then the group dismissed. But, as the group dismissed, the person running the sound cranked up some "walk out" music. The problem was that the "walk out" music was a song that celebrated (blatantly) just the opposite of the values we had been discussing in the session. The last thing students heard as they walked out of that meeting was a message that completely disregarded the message of the meeting. Was the music fun to listen to? Yes. Did the students seem to enjoy the music? Yes. Was it counter-productive to play that music? Absolutely.

Wise programming decisions begin by recognizing that every chime must be held in balance to maintain the proper harmony.



Click here to send your response plus the title of this article to us at Good News.

Good News | 308 East Main St. | P.O. Box 150 | Wilmore, KY 40390 | 859-858-4661 | 1-800-487-7784
info@goodnewsmag.org
| About Us | ©2007 Good News magazine