Global Methodism rolls through Pittsburgh—An overview
Church retains homosexual stance
Pain and protest—A Good News commentary
Is it time for an amicable and just separation?
Judicial Council clarifies church standards
Bishop calls life a song ‘waiting to be sung’
Episcopal address calls for new future
Forgetting ‘I’ and becoming ‘we’
African-American contribution celebrated
Issues: Marriage, bio-ethics, and Iraq
Prayer room offers praise in a variety of styles
Delegates support education, Africa University
African bishop urges delegates to fear the Lord
Eunice Mathews honored/ Apportionment ruling
Former presidential spokesman confronts church politics
Cote d’ Ivoire denomination joins UMC/Budget set
Biblical scholar speaks on homosexuality
Connectional Table replaces GCOM
Ministry with Young People/Pittsburgh by the numbers
Transforming Congregations—“compassion without compromise”
Episcopal Bishop Robert Duncan gives warning
The UMDecision 2004 team effort
Good News board responds to unity statement
Film Focus
Hollywood makes a pitch for marriage and family
COLUMNS
Editorial—A bittersweet 2004 General Conference
Renew Women’s Network
A violation of trust, space, and spirit
The Next Generation
Wading into youth ministry
The Great Commission
Beyond Samaria
From the Heart
Of bare feet and blackberries
Everyone seems to be making statements about marriage these days. Pop star Britney Spears made headlines not long ago when her spur-of-the-moment marriage in Las Vegas to a childhood friend lasted a whopping 55 hours. San Francisco and Boston have been wedding assembly lines for gay and lesbian couples who want to tie the knot. Now Congress is wrestling with whether or not to amend the Constitution to establish the definition of marriage between a man and a woman.
The clamor over marriage turned completely bizarre when news emerged from the Netherlands that Jennifer Hoes, a 30-year-old Dutch student, announced she would be promising to "love, respect, and honor" herself at a wedding designed to marry herself. "We live in a 'Me' society. Hence it is logical that one promises to be faithful to one's self," she said. All of that marital bliss is scheduled to be celebrated at a wacky wedding feast for family and friends costing over $20,000.
In the midst of all this unconventional nuptial chatter, Hollywood has come along and produced a romantic comedy that takes a surprisingly strong stance on marriage. Laws of Attraction is a smart and funny film starring Pierce Brosnan and Julianne Moore (pictured above) that promotes a seemingly unlikely Hollywood message: Fight hard to make your marriage work.
The movie spins around the romantic banter of two incongruent high-powered and successful divorce attorneys in New York City. It is very clear that lawyers Daniel Rafferty (Brosnan) and Audrey Woods (Moore) have fought like gladiators in divorce court, the last station on the track for irreparable relationships. Rafferty and Woods are drafted to be opposing counsel in the divorce of a high-strung and self-absorbed couple (rock star and fashion designer). They are thrust into combat over an Irish castle that each client wants as a prize.
While Rafferty and Woods are in Ireland collecting depositions, they end up at a festival in the local village. Typical of an Irish celebration, the alcohol flows and the dancing begins. Since the occasion is inspired by the historic marriage of the town's founding couple, there is even a priest there to help couples exchange "holy and binding" vows as symbols of their "eternal love."
The following morning-you guessed it-opposing counsel had tied the knot. Although it sounds a bit like the Britney Spears debacle, this movie is funny, whereas Britney's situation was not. What ensues is a quite profound grappling with whether or not the two of them should remain married.
It is the unlikely Daniel Rafferty who makes the pitch for not getting a divorce. He maintains that if people in court would work as passionately to make their marriages work as they do in destroying their spouse in divorce court, more marriages would survive.
When asked what makes marriage such a unique relationship, Pierce Brosnan said, "It is such a powerful ceremony, whether it be you and your partner and just a priest or a pastor and two friends." The man most well known for playing the dashing, debonair, and womanizing James Bond continued, "It is such a powerful commitment in the eyes of God-especially when you do it in a traditional way in the eyes of your family and friends. It is a commitment that does elevate you to another level of love and sharing and respect for each other."
It is that next level of commitment that this movie probes in a humorous and, unfortunately, sometimes crass way, befitting the emotions and anger that are unleashed in divorce court. As director Peter Howitt explained, "The people that you meet in divorce court are the people that have a passion for a fight that you did not know they had in them. Where is that passion and fight when they need it to save their marriage?"
While everyone agrees that there are certainly very understandable and just reasons for the dissolution of a marriage, the point of the movie is that it takes passion to fight to make a marriage work.
"Marriage seems to be a dying trade, which is sad, and people turn to divorce now very easily, very readily, and that is a frightening way to look at the future of humankind," said Pierce Brosnan. "We need to be committed to each other on a man to woman basis so we can create families of love, and stronger communities."
Considering that there have been more than 38 million divorces in the United States in the last 30 years-one divorce for every two marriages-this is a rather provocative and startling message coming from Hollywood, a town that is talented for publicizing scandalous divorce.
[Laws of Attraction is rated PG-13 for mature content and language.]
Click here to send your response plus the title of this article to us at Good News.